Application of 3-Step Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Difficult Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the global population, the incidence rate of acute cholecystitis is increasing. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the first choice to treat acute cholecystitis. How to effectively avoid serious intraoperative complications such as bile duct and blood vessel injury is still a difficult problem that puzzles surgeons. This paper introduces the application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a new surgical concept, in acute difficult cholecystitis. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was carried out from January 2019 to January 2021. A total of 36 patients with acute difficult cholecystitis underwent 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The general information, clinical features, surgical methods, surgical results, and postoperative complications of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the surgery, one of them was converted to laparotomy, and the other 35 cases were treated with 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 2 cases (5.56%), secondary choledocholithiasis in 1 case (2.78%), and hepatic effusion in 1 case (2.78%). No postoperative bleeding, septal infection, and other complications occurred, and no postoperative colon injury, gastroduodenal injury, liver injury, bile duct injury, vascular injury, and other surgery-related complications occurred. All 36 patients were discharged from hospital after successful recovery. No one died 30 days after surgery, and there was no abnormality in outpatient follow-up for 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Three-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be safer and more feasible for acute difficult cholecystitis patients. Compared with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy or partial cholecystectomy, 3-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the advantages of safe surgery and less complications, which is worth trying by clinicians.

BILE DUCT INJURY REPAIR IN A PATIENT WITH SITUS INVERSUS TOTALIS.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) causes significant sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life, and should be managed in centers with expertise. Anatomical variants may contribute to a higher risk of BDI during cholecystectomy. AIMS: To report a case of bile duct injury in a patient with situs inversus totalis. METHODS: A 42-year-old female patient with a previous history of situs inversus totalis and a BDI was initially operated on simultaneously to the lesion ten years ago by a non-specialized surgeon. She was referred to a specialized center due to recurrent episodes of cholangitis and a cholestatic laboratory pattern. Cholangioresonance revealed a severe anastomotic stricture. Due to her young age and recurrent cholangitis, she was submitted to a redo hepaticojejunostomy with the Hepp-Couinaud technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of BDI repair in a patient with situs inversus totalis. RESULTS: The previous hepaticojejunostomy was undone and remade with the Hepp-Couinaud technique high in the hilar plate with a wide opening in the hepatic confluence of the bile ducts towards the left hepatic duct. The previous Roux limb was maintained. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, the drain was removed on the seventh post-operative day, and the patient is now asymptomatic, with normal bilirubin and canalicular enzymes, and no further episodes of cholestasis or cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical variants may increase the difficulty of both cholecystectomy and BDI repair. BDI repair should be performed in a specialized center by formal hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeons to assure a safe perioperative management and a good long-term outcome.

Reparación laparoscópica de las lesiones quirúrgicas de la vía biliar: factibilidad y evaluación de resultados / Laparoscopic repair of bile duct injuries: Feasibility and outcomes

Introducción: Las lesiones quirúrgicas de la vía biliar (LQVB) posteriores a la colecistectomía videolaparoscópica tienen una incidencia de 0,6% aproximadamente, siendo por lo general más graves y complejas. La hepaticoyeyunoanastomosis (HYA) en Y de Roux es la mejor opción terapéutica (tasas de éxito entre 75-98%). Algunas series demostraron factible el abordaje laparoscópico en la resolución de esta patología. El objetivo es describir nuestra experiencia en la reparación laparoscópica de las LQVB. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo. Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a reparación laparoscópica posterior a LQVB. Se analizaron variables demográficas, clínicas, quirúrgicas y posoperatorias. Se aplicaron análisis estadísticos descriptivos. Resultados: Se evaluaron 92 pacientes con LQVB; 81 se sometieron a reparación quirúrgica, ocho fueron candidatos a HYA laparoscópica (aplicabilidad 9,88%). En 75% (seis) se logró una reparación laparoscópica completa. La mayoría eran mujeres (75%). Edad promedio de 40,8 ± 16,61 años (rango 19-65). Las lesiones Strasberg-Bismuth ≥ E3 afectaron a 25% (dos). En la mitad se realizó una HYA laterolateral según la técnica de Hepp-Couinaud; tres usuarios recibieron una HYA terminolateral y otro una bi-HYA terminolateral en Y de Roux. El tiempo operatorio promedio fue de 260 min (rango 120-360). La morbilidad global fue de 37,5% (tres casos): dos complicaciones menores (bilirragia grado A y hemorragia por drenajes) y una mayor (bilirragia grado C). No se registró mortalidad. El seguimiento máximo fue de 26 meses (rango 6-26). Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio muestra que, en un grupo seleccionado de pacientes, la HYA laparoscópica es factible, con los beneficios de un abordaje miniinvasivo.(AU)

Introduction: Bile duct injuries (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy occurs in approximately 0.6% of the cases, often being more severe and complex. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) is considered the optimal therapeutic option, with success rates ranging from 75% to 98%. Several series have demonstrated the advancements of the laparoscopic approach for resolving this condition. The objective of this study is to describe our experience in the laparoscopic repair of BDI. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted, including patients who underwent laparoscopic repair after BDI. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative variables were analyzed using descriptive statistical analyses. Results: Eight patients with BDI underwent laparoscopic repair (out of 81 surgically repaired patients). Women comprised 75% of the sample. A complete laparoscopic repair was achieved in 75% (6) of cases. The mean age was 40.8 ± 16.61 years (range 19–65). Injuries at or above the confluence (Strasberg–Bismuth ≥ E3) occurred in 25% of cases (2). Primary repair was performed in two cases. Half of the cases underwent a Hepp-Couinaud laterolateral RYHJ, while three patients received a terminolateral RYHJ, and one underwent a bi-terminolateral RYH. The mean operative time was 260 min (range 120–360). Overall morbidity was 37.5% (three cases): two minor complications (bile leak grade A and drainage-related bleeding) and one major complication (bile leak grade C). No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up period reached 26 months (range 6–26). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of laparoscopic RYHJ in a selected group of patients, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.(AU)

Variations in the cystic duct: frequency and the relationship among insertion sides and heights on the bile duct.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the cystic duct anatomy prior to bile duct or gallbladder surgery is important, to decrease the risk of bile duct injury. This study aimed to clarify the frequency of cystic duct variations and the relationship between them. METHODS: Data of 205 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after imaging at Sada Hospital, Japan, were analyzed. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationships among variations. RESULTS: The lateral and posterior sides of the bile duct were the two most common insertion points (92 patients, 44.9%), and the middle height was the most common insertion height (135 patients, 65.9%). Clinically important variations (spiral courses, parallel courses, low insertions, and right hepatic duct draining) relating to the risk of bile duct injury were observed in 24 patients (11.7%). Regarding the relationship between the insertion sides and heights, we noticed that the posterior insertion frequently existed in low insertions (75.0%, P < 0.001) and did not exist in high insertions. In contrast, the anterior insertion coexisted with high and never low insertions. Spiral courses have two courses: anterior and posterior, and anterior ones were only found in high insertion cases. CONCLUSIONS: The insertion point of the cystic duct and the spiral courses tended to be anterior or lateral superiorly and posterior inferiorly. Clinically significant variations in cystic duct insertions are common and surgeons should be cautious about these variations to avoid complications.

Post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) is still a major worrisome complication that is feared by all surgeons undergoing cholecystectomy. The overall incidence of biliary duct injuries falls between 0.2 and 1.3%. BDI classification remains an important method to define the type of injury conducted for investigation and management. Recently, a Consensus has been taken to define BDI using the ATOM classification. Early management brings better results than delayed management. The current perspective in biliary surgery is the laparoscopic role in diagnosing and managing BDI. Diagnostic laparoscopy has been conducted in various entities for diagnostic and therapeutic measures in minor and major BDIs. METHODS: 35 cases with iatrogenic BDI following cholecystectomy (after both open and laparoscopic approaches) both happened in or were referred to Alexandria Main University Hospital surgical department from January 2019 till May 2022 and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified according to the ATOM classification. Management options undertaken were mentioned and compared to the timing of diagnosis, and the morbidity and mortality rates (using the Clavien-Dindo classification). RESULTS: 35 patients with BDI after both laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (54.3%), and Open cholecystectomy (OC) (45.7%) (20% were converted and 25.7% were Open from the start) were classified according to ATOM classification. 45.7% were main bile duct injuries (MBDI), and 54.3% were non-main bile duct injuries (NMBDI), where only one case 2.9% was associated with vasculobiliary injury (VBI). 28% (n = 10) of the cases were diagnosed intraoperatively (Ei), 62.9% were diagnosed early postoperatively (Ep), and 8.6% were diagnosed in the late postoperative period (L). LC was associated with 84.2% of the NMBDI, and only 18.8% of the MBDI, compared to OC which was associated with 81.3% of the MBDI, and 15.8% of the NMBDI. By the Clavien-Dindo classification, 68.6% fell into Class IIIb, 20% into Class I, 5.7% into Class V (mortality rate), 2.9% into Class IIIa, and 2.9% into Class IV. The Clavien-Dindo classification and the patient's injury (type and time of detection) were compared to investigation and management options. CONCLUSION: Management options should be defined individually according to the mode of presentation, the timing of detection of injury, and the type of injury. Early detection and management are associated with lower morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic Laparoscopy was associated with lower morbidity and better outcomes. A proper Reporting checklist should be designed to help improve the identification of injury types.

Laparoscopic repair of bile duct injuries: Feasibility and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Bile duct injuries (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy occurs in approximately 0.6% of the cases, often being more severe and complex. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) is considered the optimal therapeutic option, with success rates ranging from 75% to 98%. Several series have demonstrated the advancements of the laparoscopic approach for resolving this condition. The objective of this study is to describe our experience in the laparoscopic repair of BDI. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted, including patients who underwent laparoscopic repair after BDI. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative variables were analysed using descriptive statistical analyses. RESULTS: Eight patients with BDI underwent laparoscopic repair (out of 81 surgically repaired patients). Women comprised 75% of the sample. A complete laparoscopic repair was achieved in 75% (6) of cases. The mean age was 40.8 ± 16.61 years (range 19-65). Injuries at or above the confluence (Strasberg-Bismuth ≥ E3) occurred in 25% of cases (2). Primary repair was performed in two cases. Half of the cases underwent a Hepp-Couinaud laterolateral RYHJ, while three patients received a terminolateral RYHJ, and one underwent a bi-terminolateral RYH. The mean operative time was 260 min (range 120-360). Overall morbidity was 37.5% (3 cases): two minor complications (bile leak grade A and drainage-related bleeding) and one major complication (bile leak grade C). No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up period reached 26 months (range 6-26). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of laparoscopic RYHJ in a selected group of patients, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.

Bile duct injury with formation of right hepatic duct-duodenal fistula after cholecystectomy: A case report.

RATIONALE: The management of bile duct injury (BDI) remains a considerable challenge in the department of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. BDI is mainly iatrogenic and mostly occurs in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After more than 2 decades of development, with the increase in experience and technological advances in LC, the complications associated with the procedure have decreased annually. However, bile duct injuries (BDI) still have a certain incidence, the severity of BDI is higher, and the form of BDI is more complex. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a patient who presented with bile duct injury and formation of a right hepatic duct-duodenal fistula after LC. DIAGNOSES: Based on the diagnosis, a dissection was performed to relieve bile duct obstruction, suture the duodenal fistula, and anastomose the right and left hepatic ducts to the jejunum. INTERVENTION: Based on the diagnosis, a dissection was performed to relieve bile duct obstruction, suture the duodenal fistula, and anastomose the right and left hepatic ducts to the jejunum. OUTCOMES: Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with normal liver function and no complications, such as anastomotic fistula or biliary tract infection. The patient was hospitalized for 11 days postoperatively and discharged. LESSONS: The successful diagnosis and treatment of this case and the summarization of the imaging features and diagnosis of postoperative BDI have improved the diagnostic understanding of postoperative BDI and provided clinicians with a particular clinical experience and basis for treating such diseases.

Lesión quirúrgica de la vía biliar en residentes. Experiencia de un Centro Formador Universitario / Surgical injury of the biliary tract in residents. Experience of a University Training Center

La lesión quirúrgica de la vía biliar es una complicación peligrosa de la colecistectomía, con importantes secuelas postoperatorias para el paciente en términos de morbilidad, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Tienen una incidencia laparoscópica estimada del 0,4% al 1,5% y del 0,2% al 0,3% en la colecistectomía convencional. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la incidencia de LQVB durante la formación del cirujano y la importancia de realizar colangiografía intraoperatoria (COI) durante esta etapa

Bile duct surgical injury is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality and quality of life. These have an estimated laparoscopic incidence of 0.4% to 1.5% and 0.2% to 0.3% in conventional cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of LQVB during surgeon training and the importance of performing intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during this stage

Waiting for bile duct dilation before repair of bile duct injury: a worthwhile strategy?

BACKGROUND: Hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) is the gold standard procedure for repairing major bile duct injury (BDI). Dilation status of the BD before repair has not been assessed as a risk factor for anastomotic stricture. METHOD: This retrospective single-centre study was performed on a population of 87 patients with BDI repaired by HJ between 2007 and 2021. Dilation status was assessed preoperatively, and dilation was defined as the presence of visible peripheral intrahepatic BDs with remaining BD diameter > 8 mm. The short- and long-term outcomes of HJ were assessed according to preoperative dilation status. RESULTS: Before final repair, the BDs were dilated (dBD) in 56.3% of patients and not dilated (ND) in 43.7%. Patients with ND at the time of repair had more severe BDI injury than those with dBD (94.7% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.026). The rate of preoperative cholangitis was lower in patients with ND than in those with dBD (10.5% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.001). The rate of short-term morbidity after HJ was 33.3% (ND vs. dBD: 38.8% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.32). Long-term anastomotic stricture rate was 5.7% with a mean follow-up period of 61.3 months. There were no differences in long-term biliary complications according to dilation status (ND vs. dBD: 12.2% vs. 10.5%, p = 1). CONCLUSION: Dilation status of the BD before HJ for BDI seemed to have no impact on short- or long-term outcomes. Both surgical and radiological external biliary drainages after BDI appear to be acceptable options to reduce cholangitis before repair without increasing risk for long-term anastomotic stricture.

Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Importance: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is rapidly being adopted into practice, partly based on the belief that it offers specific technical and safety advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery. Whether robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is safer than laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains unclear. Objective: To determine the uptake of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and to analyze its comparative safety vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used Medicare administrative claims data for nonfederal acute care hospitals from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Participants included 1 026 088 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 66 to 99 years of age who underwent cholecystectomy with continuous Medicare coverage for 3 months before and 12 months after surgery. Data were analyzed August 17, 2022, to June 1, 2023. Exposure: Surgical technique used to perform cholecystectomy: robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic approaches. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of bile duct injury requiring definitive surgical reconstruction within 1 year after cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes were composite outcome of bile duct injury requiring less-invasive postoperative surgical or endoscopic biliary interventions, and overall incidence of 30-day complications. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed adjusting for patient factors and clustered within hospital referral regions. An instrumental variable analysis was performed, leveraging regional variation in the adoption of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy within hospital referral regions over time, to account for potential confounding from unmeasured differences between treatment groups. Results: A total of 1 026 088 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [12.0] years; 53.3% women) were included in the study. The use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy increased 37-fold from 211 of 147 341 patients (0.1%) in 2010 to 6507 of 125 211 patients (5.2%) in 2019. Compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury necessitating a definitive operative repair within 1 year (0.7% vs 0.2%; relative risk [RR], 3.16 [95% CI, 2.57-3.75]). Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was also associated with a higher rate of postoperative biliary interventions, such as endoscopic stenting (7.4% vs 6.0%; RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.16-1.33]). There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complication rates between the 2 procedures. The instrumental variable analysis, which was designed to account for potential unmeasured differences in treatment groups, also showed that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with a higher rate of bile duct injury (0.4% vs 0.2%; RR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.14-2.63]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study's finding of significantly higher rates of bile duct injury with robotic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests that the utility of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy should be reconsidered, given the existence of an already minimally invasive, predictably safe laparoscopic approach.

Use of artificial intelligence for decision-support to avoid high-risk behaviors during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are a significant source of morbidity among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). GoNoGoNet is an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that has been developed and validated to identify safe ("Go") and dangerous ("No-Go") zones of dissection during LC, with the potential to prevent BDIs through real-time intraoperative decision-support. This study evaluates GoNoGoNet's ability to predict Go/No-Go zones during LCs with BDIs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Eleven LC videos with BDI (BDI group) were annotated by GoNoGoNet. All tool-tissue interactions, including the one that caused the BDI, were characterized in relation to the algorithm's predicted location of Go/No-Go zones. These were compared to another 11 LC videos with cholecystitis (control group) deemed to represent "safe cholecystectomy" by experts. The probability threshold of GoNoGoNet annotations were then modulated to determine its relationship to Go/No-Go predictions. Data is shown as % difference [99% confidence interval]. RESULTS: Compared to control, the BDI group showed significantly greater proportion of sharp dissection (+ 23.5% [20.0-27.0]), blunt dissection (+ 32.1% [27.2-37.0]), and total interactions (+ 33.6% [31.0-36.2]) outside of the Go zone. Among injury-causing interactions, 4 (36%) were in the No-Go zone, 2 (18%) were in the Go zone, and 5 (45%) were outside both zones, after maximizing the probability threshold of the Go algorithm. CONCLUSION: AI has potential to detect unsafe dissection and prevent BDIs through real-time intraoperative decision-support. More work is needed to determine how to optimize integration of this technology into the operating room workflow and adoption by end-users.

Liver transplantation for iatrogenic bile duct injury: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) is an infrequent but serious complication of cholecystectomy, often with life-changing consequences. Liver transplantation (LT) may be required following severe BDI, however given the rarity, few large studies exist to guide management for complex BDI. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to assess post-operative complications, 30-day mortality, retransplant rate and 1-year and 5-year survival following LT for BDI in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science or Cochrane Clinical Trials Database. RESULTS: Seven articles met inclusion criteria, describing 179 patients that underwent LT for BDI. Secondary biliary cirrhosis (SBC) was the main indication for LT (82.2% of patients). Median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores at time of LT ranged from 16 to 20.5. Median 30-day mortality was 20.0%. The 1-year and 5-year survival ranges were 55.0-84.3% and 30.0-83.3% respectively, and the overall retransplant rate was 11.5%. CONCLUSION: BDI is rarely indicated for LT, predominantly for SBC following multiple prior interventions. MELD scores poorly reflect underlying morbidity, and exception criteria for waitlisting may avoid prolonged LT waiting times. 30-day mortality was higher than for non-BDI indications, with comparable long term survival, suggesting that LT remains a viable but high risk salvage option for severe BDI.

Bile duct injury after cholecystectomy: timing of surgical repair should be based on clinical presentation. The experience of a tertiary referral center with Hepp-Couinaud hepatico-jejunostomy.

Impact of timing of repair on outcomes of patients repaired with Hepp-Couinaud hepatico-jejunostomy (HC-HJ) after bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy remains debated. This is an observational retrospective study at a tertiary referral hepato-biliary center. HC-HJ was always performed in patients without sepsis or bile leak and with dilated bile ducts. Timing of repair was classified as: early (≤ 2 weeks), intermediate (> 2 weeks, ≤ 6 weeks), and delayed (> 6 weeks). 114 patients underwent HC-HJ between 1994 and 2022: 42.1% underwent previous attempts of repair at referring institutions (Group A) and 57.9% were referred without any attempt of repair before referral (Group B). Overall, a delayed HC-HJ was performed in 78% of patients; intermediate and early repair were performed in 17% and 6%, respectively. In Group B, 10.6% of patients underwent an early, 27.3% an intermediate, and 62.1% a delayed repair. Postoperative mortality was nil. Median follow-up was 106.7 months. Overall primary patency (PP) attainment rate was 94.7%, with a 5- and 10-year actuarial primary patency (APP) of 84.6% and 84%, respectively. Post-repair bile leak was associated with PP loss in the entire population (odds ratio [OR] 9.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-57.87, p = 0.012); no correlation of PP loss with timing of repair was noted. Treatment of anastomotic stricture (occurred in 15.3% of patients) was performed with percutaneous treatment, achieving absence of biliary symptoms in 93% and 91% of cases at 5 and 10 years, respectively. BDI can be successfully repaired by HC-HJ regardless of timing when surgery is performed in stable patients with dilated bile ducts and without bile leak.

Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder.

BACKGROUND: Most bile duct (BDI) injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) occur due to visual misperception leading to the misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning (DL) models for surgical video analysis could, therefore, support visual tasks such as identifying critical view of safety (CVS). This study aims to develop a prediction model of CVS during LC. This aim is accomplished using a deep neural network integrated with a segmentation model that is capable of highlighting hepatocytic anatomy. METHODS: Still images from LC videos were annotated with four hepatocystic landmarks of anatomy segmentation. A deep autoencoder neural network with U-Net to investigate accurate medical image segmentation was trained and tested using fivefold cross-validation. Accuracy, Loss, Intersection over Union (IoU), Precision, Recall, and Hausdorff Distance were computed to evaluate the model performance versus the annotated ground truth. RESULTS: A total of 1550 images from 200 LC videos were annotated. Mean IoU for segmentation was 74.65%. The proposed approach performed well for automatic hepatocytic landmarks identification with 92% accuracy and 93.9% precision and can segment challenging cases. CONCLUSION: DL, can potentially provide an intraoperative model for surgical video analysis and can be trained to guide surgeons toward reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation and produce selective video documentation of this safety step of LC.

Optimizing surgical management of iatrogenic bile duct injury: transhepatic percutaneous cholangial drainage combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis.

Iatrogenic bile duct injury remains the most severe complication of gallbladder surgeries. To reduce post-operation complication, we introduce an improved approach for bile duct injury repairment, named transhepatic percutaneous cholangial drainage (TPCD) which combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis. Clinical data obtained from 12 patients between February 2012 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographic, clinical, operative, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. All injuries were repaired successfully and no fatal cases occurred. The mean operative time and hospital stay duration were 367.5 ± 103.2 min and 11.3 ± 3.5 days, respectively. In two cases (16.7%), bile leakage occurred at the bile duct anastomosis site. Three patients (25.0%) developed low-grade fever and one patient (8.3%) developed a postoperative infection of the incision site. No postoperative bleeding or bile duct strictures occurred in any of the cases. The patients were followed up from 12 to 122 months (median, 70.5 months). No cholangitis or bile duct restenosis was observed after biliary drainage tube removal. There were no long-term bile duct-related complications seen in the follow-up time. It is safe and feasible for TPCD combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis using in bile duct injury.

Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: According to the National Clinical Database of Japan, the incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has hovered around 0.4% for the last 10 years and has not declined. On the other hand, it has been found that about 60% of BDI occurrences are due to misidentifying anatomical landmarks. However, the authors developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system that gave intraoperative data to recognize the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD), cystic duct (CD), inferior border of liver S4 (S4), and Rouviere sulcus (RS). The purpose of this research was to evaluate how the AI system affects landmark identification. METHODS: We prepared a 20-s intraoperative video before the serosal incision of Calot's triangle dissection and created a short video with landmarks overwritten by AI. The landmarks were defined as landmark (LM)-EHBD, LM-CD, LM-RS, and LM-S4. Four beginners and four experts were recruited as subjects. After viewing a 20-s intraoperative video, subjects annotated the LM-EHBD and LM-CD. Then, a short video is shown with the AI overwriting landmark instructions; if there is a change in each perspective, the annotation is changed. The subjects answered a three-point scale questionnaire to clarify whether the AI teaching data advanced their confidence in verifying the LM-RS and LM-S4. Four external evaluation committee members investigated the clinical importance. RESULTS: In 43 of 160 (26.9%) images, the subjects transformed their annotations. Annotation changes were primarily observed in the gallbladder line of the LM-EHBD and LM-CD, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The AI-based teaching data encouraged both beginners and experts to affirm the LM-RS and LM-S4. CONCLUSION: The AI system provided significant awareness to beginners and experts and prompted them to identify anatomical landmarks linked to reducing BDI.

Liver transplantation for iatrogenic injuries secondary to cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic injury to the liver hilum during cholecystectomy is a severe surgical complication, with liver transplantation (LT) as the final drastic solution. The authors report the experience of our center and conduct a review of the literature on the outcomes of LT performed in this setting. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 19 June 2022. Studies reporting on patients treated with LT for liver hilar injuries following cholecystectomy were included. Incidence, clinical outcomes, and survival data were synthesized through a narrative review. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were identified, including 213 patients. Eleven (40.7%) articles highlighted deaths within 90-days post-LT. Post-LT mortality was reported in 28 (13.1%) patients. Severe complications (≥Clavien III) occurred in at least 25.8% ( n =55) of patients. Within larger cohorts, 1-year overall survival (OS) was 76.5-84.3%, and 5-year OS was 67.2-83.0%. The authors also highlight our own experience managing 14 patients with liver hilar injury secondary to cholecystectomy, of which two required LT. CONCLUSION: While short-term morbidity and mortality is significant, available long-term data suggests reasonable OS in these patients following LT. Future studies are necessary to better understand the relationship between different types of liver hilar injury, transplant indication, and outcomes of LT in this setting.

Clinical value of fluorescent cholangiography for the infraportal type of right posterior bile duct.

BACKGROUND: The infraportal type of the right posterior bile duct (infraportal RPBD) is a well-known anatomical variation that increases the potential risk of intraoperative biliary injury. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical value of fluorescent cholangiography during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) for patients with infraportal RPBD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our procedure for SILC utilized the SILS-Port, and another 5-mm forceps was inserted via an umbilical incision. A laparoscopic fluorescence imaging system developed by Karl Storz Endoskope was utilized for fluorescent cholangiography. Between July 2010 and March 2022, 41 patients with infraportal RPBD underwent SILC. We conducted retrospective reviews of patient data, focusing on the clinical value of fluorescent cholangiography. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent fluorescent cholangiography during SILC, but the remaining ten did not. Only one patient who did not undergo fluorescent cholangiography developed an intraoperative biliary injury. The detectability of infraportal RPBD before and during the dissection of Calot's triangle was 16.1% and 45.2%, respectively. These visible infraportal RPBDs were characterized as connections to the common bile duct. The confluence pattern of infraportal RPBD significantly influenced its detectability during the dissection of Calot's triangle (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of fluorescent cholangiography can lead to safe SILC, even for patients with infraportal RPBD. Its benefit is emphasized when infraportal RPBD is connected to the common bile duct.